|
 
 |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2015 | Volume
: 5
| Issue : 2 | Page : 72-75 |
|
Distribution of corneal and ocular spherical aberrations in eyes with cataract in the Taiwanese population
Yung-Jen Lai1, Shu-I Yeh1, Huey-Chuan Cheng2
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Mackay Memorial Hospital; Mackay Medicine, Nursing and Management College, Taipei, Taiwan
| Date of Web Publication | 10-Jun-2015 |
Correspondence Address:
Huey-Chuan Cheng
Number 92, Section 2, Zhongshan North Road, Zhongshan District, Taipei City 104, Taiwan
Taiwan
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | 7 |
DOI: 10.1016/j.tjo.2015.03.003
Purpose: To investigate the distribution of corneal and ocular spherical aberrations (SAs) in eyes with cataract in the Taiwanese population.
Methods: Corneal and ocular SAs were measured in the central 6-mm optical zone using wavefront aberrometry. Axial length (AL) and keratometry (K) were also evaluated in each eye.
Results: A total of 413 eyes in 234 patients were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 66.8 ± 10.64 years. The mean AL and K values were 24.32 mm and 44.08 D, respectively. The mean corneal SA was 0.307 ± 0.135 μm and ocular SA was −0.042 ± 0.487 μm. Ocular and corneal SAs were significantly correlated (r2 = 0.04, p < 0.001). Corneal and ocular SAs were not significantly correlated with K (p = 0.096 and p = 0.634, respectively), but were significantly correlated with AL (p < 0.001). Multilinear regression showed that corneal SAs and age were the dependent variables that predicted ocular SAs (r2 = 0.143, F = 13.65, p < 0.01), especially in patients who were aged > 50 years, for whom a strongly significant positive correlation was found (r2 = 0.102, F = 11.10, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Corneal and ocular SAs varied among cataract patients and correlated with AL. After 50 years of age, ocular SAs increased significantly because of an increase in internal (lenticular) SAs. Corneal SAs in Taiwanese patients were larger than those in Japanese patients and similar to those in Chinese and Malaysian populations. Preoperative measurement of wavefront aberrations is necessary to select which aspherical intraocular lenses are most suitable for achieving better postoperative visual quality.
Keywords: cornea, spherical aberration, cataract, taiwanese population
How to cite this article:
Lai YJ, Yeh SI, Cheng HC. Distribution of corneal and ocular spherical aberrations in eyes with cataract in the Taiwanese population. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2015;5:72-5 |
How to cite this URL:
Lai YJ, Yeh SI, Cheng HC. Distribution of corneal and ocular spherical aberrations in eyes with cataract in the Taiwanese population. Taiwan J Ophthalmol [serial online] 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 25];5:72-5. Available from: https://www.e-tjo.org/text.asp?2015/5/2/72/204157 |
| 1. Introduction | |  |
Optical aberrations of the eye can be divided into lower-order aberrations (LOAs) and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). Spherical aberration (SA) is a type of HOA and is caused by a difference in focus between central rays and peripheral rays that reach the retina at the same time. HOAs may interfere with visual quality by resulting in decreased contrast sensitivity, glare, and halos. Currently, the availability of wavefront-sensing devices in ophthalmic clinics has permitted a greater understanding of the impact of aberrations on vision. Advancements in cataract surgery and intraocular lens (IOL) design have made possible the customization of target refraction by appropriate IOL power selection. Moreover, aspherical IOLs have been designed to eliminate corneal SAs with substantial levels of success beyond visual acuity.[1],[2]
The design of IOLs to reduce or eliminate SAs in pseudophakic eyes is based on compensating for the resulting corneal SA after removal of the crystalline lens.
Salmon and van de Pol[3] established the population norms of ocular aberrations in a large cohort of 2560 eyes. However, only 134 eyes were from an Asian population (Japan). Shimozono et al[4] reported the corneal SA values of aJapanese group, and Lim and Fam[5] reported the distribution of SA values in a Singaporean-Malaysian population. There was a large difference in corneal SA values between these two ethnic groups. Furthermore, age may play a role in ocular HOAs. Fujikado et al[6] reported that ocular HOAs increase significantly after the age of 50 years, but there was no correlation between age and corneal SAs. The aim of our study was to investigate corneal and ocular SAs (Zernike coefficient, Z40)in a Taiwanese population and to compare them with the findings of previously published studies.
| 2. Materials and methods | | |
This retrospective study was comprised of patients with a diagnosis of senile or presenile cataract in Mackay Memorial Hospital from September 2011 to August 2012. All patients were Taiwanese, and they had cataracts that caused visual impairment with a best corrected visual acuity of <20/50. Patients with a history of corneal pathology or ocular surgery, but not of eyelid surgery, were excluded. Axial length (AL) and keratometry (K) were measured under regular room light conditions using partial coherence interferometry (IOL Master; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), and all signal-to-noise ratios were ≥3. Eyes with previous ocular surgery and dense cataract that could not be measured using the IOL Master were also excluded.
Corneal and ocular SAs (Z40) were obtained using the Wavefront Aberrometer (NIDEK OPD-Scan II ARK-10000; Gamagori, Aichi, Japan). This scanner is a multifunction instrument that integrates Placido-based corneal topography with wavefront aberrometry of the entire eye. The wavefront measuring apparatus is based on the principle of retinoscopy, which uses an infrared slit of light to scan all 360° meridians over a 6-mm pupil. The time difference of the reflected light to stimulate an array of photodetectors is translated to a refractive wavefront map.[7] Measurements were taken at the central 6-mm optic zone without mydriasis for all patients included in this study. The examination was performed by a single experienced technician.
The aberrations were tabulated in Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA), and the analysis was performed using Graph-Pad Instat software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). All parameters were normally distributed (passing the Kolmogor-ov–Smirnov test of normality); thus, linear regression and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to compare groups and values. A multilinear regression model, consisting of ocular parameters associated with ocular SA, was tested. These parameters were age, K, corneal SA, and AL. A p value < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.
| 3. Results | | |
We analyzed 413 eyes (OD eyes: 207; OS eyes: 206) in 234 patients (98 men; 136 women) with a diagnosis of cataract from September 2011 to August 2012. The mean [± standard deviation (SD)] age of the patients was 66.80 ± 10.64 years (range, 38–97 years). The mean AL was 24.32 mm [95% confidence interval (CI), 24.136–24.512 mm], and the mean K was 44.08 D [Table 1].
The mean corneal and ocular SAs were 0.307 ± 0.135 μm (range, −0.200–0.840 μm) and −0.042 ± 0.487 μm (range, −3.100–2.180 μm), respectively. The distribution of corneal SAs is shown in [Figure 1]. Three eyes had negative corneal SAs, from −0.2 μm to −0.11 μm; all of the patients denied trauma or previous ocular surgeries, and no corneal deformities were found at slit lamp examination. The relationship between ocular and corneal SAs was statistically significant (r2 = 0.04, p < 0.001). Corneal and ocular SAs were not significantly correlated with K (p = 0.096 and p = 0.634, respectively), but were significantly correlated with AL ( p < 0.001). | Figure 1: Distribution of corneal spherical aberrations (Z40) was compatible with normality distribution, despite three negative values. The mean Z40 value of 0.307 ± 0.135 μm is represented by the thick solid line.
Click here to view |
Although corneal SAs were not significantly correlated with age ( p = 0.895), ocular SAs were strongly correlated with age (p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis in patients aged > 50 years showed a strong correlation between ocular SAs and age (r = 0.256, p < 0.001); such a correlation was not observed between corneal SAs and age (r = 0.049, p = 0.338; [Figure 2]). Corneal and ocular SAs were not significantly correlated with age in patients aged < 50 years (r =-0.458, p = 0.032). [Figure 3] shows the mean ocular and corneal SAs in the different age groups: 30–39 years (n = 3), 40–49 years (n = 19), 50–59 years (n = 81), 60–69 years (n = 142), 70–79 years (n = 117), and ≥80 years (n = 51). | Figure 2: The relationship between age and spherical aberrations (SAs) in patients aged >50 years. Solid line: linear regression between age and corneal SAs (r = 0.049, p = 0.338); dotted line: linear regression between age and ocular SAs (r = 0.256, p < 0.001).
Click here to view |
 | Figure 3: Mean ocular and corneal spherical aberrations (SAs) in the different age groups: 30–39 years, 40–49 years, 50–59 years, 60–69 years, 70–79 years, and ≥ 80 years. There was a significant intergroup difference in ocular SAs (ANOVA: F = 12.131, p < 0.001) but not in corneal SAs (ANOVA: F = 1.866, p = 0.099). ANOVA = analysis of variance.
Click here to view |
Multilinear regression analysis showed that corneal SAs and age were significant correlates for ocular SAs (r2 = 0.143, F = 13.65, p < 0.01; [Table 2]), especially in the patients who were aged > 50 years (r2 = 0.102, F = 11.10, p < 0.001). | Table 2: Linear model of ocular spherical aberrations and associated factors.
Click here to view |
| 4. Discussion | | |
Cataract surgery is one of the most common surgeries in the world, and the goal of cataract surgery is to restore youthful vision. Improvements in surgical techniques and IOL designs have resulted in the possibility of both better visual acuity and better visual quality. SA plays an important role in HOAs, and it is associated with visual quality and performance. Total ocular SAs include corneal SAs and intraocular SAs, and most intraocular SAs are derived from lens factors. A positive corneal SA is commonly seen in the general population, with lower ocular SAs in younger age groups due to compensation by negative intraocular SAs.
We reported that the mean ( ± SD) corneal SA of the Taiwanese population was 0.307 ± 0.135 μm (95% CI, 0.294–0.320 μm), which was close to the result reported by Lim and Fam[5] among a Chinese population in Malaysia (0.312 ± 0.114 μm). Furthermore, our result was higher than that for the Japanese[4] (0.203 ± 0.1 μm) and Ca-nadian[8] (0.27 μm) populations, but lower than that in the Italian study[9] (0.328 ± 0.132 μm). Our result was similar to that found in a Malaysian population (0.307 μm vs. 0.312 μm) but was lower than that found in a Chinese population in Beijing[10] (0.413 ± 0.161 μm). The Taiwanese population is considered to be of the same race as the Chinese population; however, we observed a large difference in corneal SAs between our study and the Beijing study. It is unclear whether there is a true difference in corneal SAs among different ethnic groups. Many different subethnic groups exist in mainland China, Taiwan, and Malaysia; therefore, miscegenation among ethnic groups must be considered. Specific subethnic groups are not mentioned in current literature, and most studies comprise of patients by nation or residence. Population selection by ethnicity, even subethnicity, and not by nation is necessary to determine whether ethnic variation significantly affects corneal SAs. In addition, the mean age of the Malaysian[5] population (31.44 years) was less, as the patients were recruited from the refractive surgery clinics. Our study and the Beijing[10] study recruited older patients with a diagnosis of cataract.
According to Fujikado et al[6] ocular total HOAs, including ocular SAs, increased significantly after 50 years of age, but there was no correlation between age and corneal SAs. Amano et al[11] and Lyall et al[12] also reported that ocular SAs (but not corneal SAs) increase with age, mainly because of internal optical aberrations.
We showed the same relationship between aging and SAs in the current study, evident by the linear regression line shown in [Figure 2] (between age and ocular SA: r = 0.256, p < 0.001) However, Yuan and Bao[10] reported a positive correlation between corneal SAs and age in the Beijing study; the correlation between total ocular SAs and age was not mentioned. The increase in ocular SAs with age is believed to be due to an increase in lenticular SAs,[6],[11],[12] but it could not be proven because there was no equipment available to measure lenticular SAs. Aging may decrease corneal endothelial cell number, however, it does not usually change cornea size or curvature. Compared with the cornea, lens aberrations (anterior and posterior lens radius and curvature, lens thickness, and refractive index) are more significantly associated with aging.[13] Thus, age-associated corneal changes have less of an effect on ocular SAs.
In the current study, we found that corneal SAs correlated with AL and that K were not the dependent variable that predicted corneal SAs. Shimozono et al[4] found a significantly negative correlation between AL and corneal SAs (r = −0.135). Beiko et al[8] reported a positive correlation between K and corneal SAs (r = 0.241–0.295), but K readings were not a predictive variable for corneal SAs. Although a significant correlation was found between corneal SAs and AL, it was not strong enough to predict corneal SAs. There is wide individual variation in corneal SAs, and accurate preoperative measurement of corneal SAs for IOL selection is still needed. Previous studies have suggested that lowering postoperative ocular SAs can improve visual quality, especially contrast sensitivity.[14] The mean (± SD) corneal SA for the Taiwanese group was 0.307 ± 0.135 μm; therefore, aspherical IOLs with a negative SA design–such as Tecnis ZCB00 (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and Alcon SN60WF (Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA)–may better compensate for positive corneal SAs. Optimal and complete customization is difficult to achieve, therefore we select the asphericity of the IOL that is most appropriate for each patient.
In our study, corneal and ocular SAs varied among patients with cataract and correlated with AL. Ocular SAs increased significantly after 50 years of age, mainly due to increases in internal (lenticular) HOAs. Corneal SAs were larger in the Taiwanese population than in the Japanese population, but were similar to those of the Chinese and Malaysian populations. For wide variance in corneal SAs, pre-operative measurement of wavefront aberrations using corneal topography is necessary to select which aspherical IOLs are most suitable for individual patients.
Conflicts of interest: All contributing authors declare no conflicts of interest
| References | | |
| 1. | Liang J, Williams DR. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997;14:2873–2883.  |
| 2. | Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NE. A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:683–691. |
| 3. | Salmon TO, van de Pol C. Normal-eye Zernike coefficients and root-mean-square wavefront errors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:2064–2074. |
| 4. | Shimozono M, Uemura A, Hirami Y, Ishida K, Kurimoto Y. Corneal spherical aberration of eyes with cataract in a Japanese population. J Refract Surg.2010;26:457–459. |
| 5. | Lim KL, Fam HB. Ethnic differences in higher-order aberrations: spherical aberration in the South East Asian Chinese eye. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:2144–2148. |
| 6. | Fujikado T, Kuroda T, Ninomiya S, et al. Age-related changes in ocular and corneal aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:143–146. |
| 7. | MacRae S, Fujieda M. Slit skiascopic-guided ablation using the Nidek laser. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:S576–S580. |
| 8. | Beiko GH, Haigis W, Steinmueller A. Distribution ofcorneal spherical aberration in a comprehensive ophthalmology practice and whether keratometry can predict aberration values. JCataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:848–858. |
| 9. | de Sanctis U, Vinai L, Bartoli E, Donna P, Grignolo F. Total spherical aberration of the cornea in patients with cataract. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:1251 –1258. |
| 10. | Yuan L, Bao Y. Analysis of the corneal spherical aberration in people with senile cataract. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2014;50:100–104 [In Chinese]. |
| 11. | Amano S, Amano Y, Yamagami S, et al. Age-related changes in corneal and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:988–992. |
| 12. | Lyall DA, Srinivasan S, Gray LS. Changes in ocular monochromatic higher-order aberrations in the aging eye. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:996–1003. |
| 13. | Dubbelman M, Van der Heijde GL. The shape of the aging human lens: curvature, equivalent refractive index and the lens paradox. Vis Res. 2001;41:1867–1877. |
| 14. | Pandita D, Raj SM, Vasavada VA, Vasavada VA, Kazi NS, Vasavada AR. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens: prospective randomized masked clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:603–610. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Latest Development in Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: An Update |
|
| Elinor Megiddo-Barnir, Jorge L. Alió | | Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. 2023; 12(1): 58 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 2 |
Correlations of Corneal Curvature with Corneal Spherical Aberration and Anterior Chamber Parameters in Eyes with Shallow Anterior Chambers |
|
| Fei Yang, Yongzhen Bao | | Ophthalmology and Therapy. 2022; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 3 |
Analysis of Corneal Spherical Aberrations in Chinese Bilateral Ectopia Lentis Patients |
|
| Jiahui Chen, Yating Tang, Qinghe Jing, Yi Lu, Yongxiang Jiang | | Frontiers in Medicine. 2021; 8 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 4 |
Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update |
|
| Piotr Kanclerz,Francesca Toto,Andrzej Grzybowski,Jorge L. Alio | | Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020; 9(3): 194 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 5 |
Normative Values of Corneal Spherical Aberration, Pupil Size, and Other Key Refractive and Topographic Parameters in a Large Cohort of Egyptian Cataract Surgery Candidates |
|
| Rania Serag Elkitkat,Yousef Fouad,Abdelrhman Shams,Ismail Hamza | | Clinical Ophthalmology. 2020; Volume 14: 4571 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 6 |
Distribution of corneal spherical aberration in a Tanzanian population |
|
| Hiroki Asano,Takahiro Hiraoka,Yusuke Seki,Teppei Shibata,Hiromi Osada,Takanori Saruta,Natsuko Hatsusaka,Fukumi Fujikake,Yoshiaki Tabata,Cellina Mhina,Anna Sanyiwa,Tetsuro Oshika,Hiroshi Sasaki,Hidenaga Kobashi | | PLOS ONE. 2019; 14(9): e0222297 | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | | | 7 |
Clinical study inpatient-reported outcomes after binocular implantation of aspheric intraocular lens of different negative spherical aberrations |
|
| Ze-Quan Xu,Xu-Hua Song,Wen-Zhe Li,Yan Dou,Qiang Wu | | Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2017; | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
 |
|
|
|
Search Pubmed for